__________________________________________________________
10.- GOOD VIBES TO A POET AND A
SHARER
Our dear SHARER Adriana Benvenuto,
currently living in the States and working towards her M.A. at Soka University
writes to us
Dear Omar and
Marina:
I have been and I am so busy at
Soka that I am now a passive member of your newsletter.Althought I enjoy my time
here, I DO miss teaching, running from school to school, lesson planning, my
students' faces...EVERYTHING about teaching.Your messages keep me close from all
that teaching environment.
I could have sent a small
contribution from here, I know...but this time away from teaching has inspired
me to write prose and poetry and make a stronger connection with my inner
feelings.
I am attaching a poem that I wrote
a few months ago which appears on www.poetry.com.
My poetry postings are on that
website and two of them are going to be published on a book, one recorded on a
CD.
Looking forward to receiving your
good vibes from Argentina.
Adriana
To live or to die?
To live or
die?
To love or
hate?
To give or
receive?
I don't know what to
do?
Confused like a
child,
Who doesn't know where to
look
As he crosses the
street
The veins are getting
darker,
Blood circulates
slower
The sun I see isn't the same
one
That shines on the open
fields
Mankind's
immortality
Depends on people's
maturity
Do we end it
all?
Do we start all
over?
Or do we improve today's
conditions?
If after two thousand
years,
We don't know how to
share,
What good is it to teach
manners
To a child who is born without
asking?
Adri, receive our very best wishes
for a successful career in writing. We all hope to have you among us soon.
_____________________________________________________
11.- CHOMSKY : IDEAS AND IDEALS - A
REVIEW
Our dear friend and
SHARER Andrea Coviella sends us this review of the book by N. Smith
"Chomsky: Ideas and ideals" that was published in the
LINGUIST
List: Vol-12-761. Tue Mar 20
2001. - linguist@linguistlist.org. -
Home
Page: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by
Eastern Michigan University, Wayne State University, and donations
from subscribers and publishers.
___________________
Smith, Neil (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge:
Cambridge
University Press. Paperback GBP
12.95.
Reviewed by Christiane Bongartz,
University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
The title of Neil Smith's book is the best possible summary of what
the
author sets out to do, namely to
explore Noam Chomsky's intellectual and
ideological contributions to
contemporary linguistics, politics, and philosophy. Focusing on Chomsky's public thought and
writing, not personal circumstance, Smith gives an
overview of a life devoted to radical thought.
Smith first introduces aspects of
Chomsky's linguistic theory
and then
proceeds to present his political
ideas. The linguistic and the
political aspects of Chomsky's thinking,
Smith argues, are inextricably linked and together represent a coherent
framework for interpreting both human nature and the world. In short, ideas and
ideals merge to form a new whole, Chomsky's
oeuvre.
Synopsis:
After a brief assessment in the
introduction of Chomsky's importance in the
20th century - which is compared to
that of Darwin and Descartes - Smith
devotes five chapters to providing
evidence for this claim. While the
first
three chapters focus narrowly on
linguistics, the fourth links linguistics and philosophy, laying the
foundation for a comparison of Chomsky's language
philosophy and his political
convictions and activism in the fifth and final chapter.
Chapter 1 "The mirror of the mind"
introduces the reader to Chomsky's
conceptualization of language as a
species-defining genetically inherited
phenomenon. Linguistics is thus part of the
scientific investigation of human nature, an investigation that
must go beyond linguistic description and explain how we know
language. In other words,
linguistic explanation reveals how our mind works with
respect to individual psychological disposition, making grammar a part
of our mental organization.
Chapter 2 "The linguistic
foundation" lays out the stages in the development
of Chomsky's linguistic theory
since its inception in the 1950s.
Smith shows how the theory moved from
grammar as a mere sentence-making mechanism to levels of syntactic
representation (deep structure and surface structure) and then further to just a few
minimal abstract principles governing syntactic movement. Increase in explanatory adequacy emerges
as the motivating factor behind each new
incarnation of the theory.
Chapter 3 "Psychological reality"
explores the link between language and
psychology and cognition. Grammar and language rules can best be
captured
as biological facts that take the
form of mental representations in the language module of our brain. Smith offers supporting evidence from
language
processing, first language acquisition, and studies of language pathology. Modular representational models are
superior to connectionist models of linguistic knowledge, he
claims, in that they do justice to language-specific principles such
as structure-dependency.
Chapter 4 "Philosophical realism:
commitments and controversies" relates
Chomsky's linguistic theory to the
underlying philosophy of realism and the
evaluative device of radical
empiricism. Outlining some of the major
controversies surrounding Chomskyan
thought, Smith points to perceived
misconceptions and
misunderstandings that fuel(ed) such controversies.
Chomsky's concept of language as
part of individual psychology often remains
unappreciated by those that view
language as an external communication device. Smith argues that Chomskyan ideas
have not been convincingly
refuted in
terms of big-picture considerations (the adequacy of a realism) nor in terms of small
picture ones (banning semantics and pragmatics from the core of linguistic
inquiry).
Chapter 5 "Language and freedom"
extends the scope of discussion to relate
Chomsky's relentless political
activism to the philosophical ideals
prevalent in his academic
work. Reviewing the many
issues to which Chomsky
has taken a public stance, Smith
argues for a coherence of thought that
movitates both his
conceptualization of human nature and his depiction of
what it takes for human nature to
unfold optimally within the given biological
constraints.
Evaluation
Smith's book differs from others
reviewing Chomsky's oeuvre in that it
embraces both the linguistic ideas
(cf. Newmeyer, 1986) and political ideals
(cf. Barsky, 1995) motivating his
many writings.
This dual orientation makes the
book both original and somewhat unusual,
leaving it to the reader to agree
or disagree with the coherence that Smith
has uncovered in the two areas of
Chomsky's activities.
Although the author writes
accessibly and in everyday language, his
presentation of the linguistic
theory developed by Chomsky over the years
can best be digested with some
previous knowledge of syntactic theory.
It is Smith's accomplishment to take
apart the theory and present it according to lines of controversy in the
field. Thus he separates theory development (chapters 1 and 2) from the issue
of psychological reality (chapter 3), which allows him to draw on
empirical evidence that illustrates how linguistic concepts are represented
in the human psyche.
Data from language acquisition and
language impairment serve to defend
Chomky's theoretical concepts
(chapter 3, chapter 4, and chapter 5) - and
explicating and defending the
Chomskyan perspective is a goal Smith has very
obviously set for himself. It is thus not surprising that the
reader gets
carefully equipped in the
linguistics chapters for the discussion of the
philosophical concepts underlying
Chomsky's linguistic theory in chapter 4.
Chapter 4 is perhaps the most
ambitious of all. Although there are some
problems with the overall structure
(the division into subheadings seems
somewhat arbitrary and is never
explained), Smith does a fine job in
highlighting the major lines of
controversy concerning the embodiment of
linguistic structure and the nature
of language as a psychological phenomenon. Especially the discussion of language
and the community as opposed to language in the
individual is one worthwhile reading for those not familiar with this longstanding
debate. Readers looking for an
in-depth refutation of Chomsky's opponents,
however, might be disappointed - because of the broad scope of the chapter,
more room has been given to Chomsky's ideas than to those questioning
them.
The most interesting chapter of the
book and the most original one is certainly Chapter 5. It is here where Smith makes the case
that the ideas of a modular brain with
constraint-based representations can be extended from linguistic knowledge to human
nature as such. Chomsky's political
anarchism,
then, requires the exertion of free will within the limits of a so-constrained human
organism. Although the author admits that Chomsky himself does not perceive of his
political and linguistic ideas as being so linked, Smith's argument is
intriguing, especially in the light of other contemporary attempts to replace
fragmented postmodernism with coherent models of explanation (cf. Johnson
& Lakoff, 1999). Political
anarchism, on this view, is to an innate module
of moral disposition what linguistics is to the innate language
faculty. While one must be careful
not to attribute this claim to Chomsky, it is a
plausible extension of his suggestions - one that might well attract more
attention as the 21st century unfolds.
Summary
Smith's book is both informative
and thought-provoking. Those
interested in
an overview of Chomsky's work will
find what they are looking for if they are willing to go with the
pro-Chomskyan attitude that Smith has adopted and does not seek to conceal. The book's major strength is its
big-picture perspective - an intriguing
combination of problems of linguistic knowledge, philosophy, and politics. In this sense, ideas and ideals unite to
form an ideology that both builds on and
transcends other models of human nature.
References
Barsky, R. (1997) Noam Chomsky:
A life of dissent. Cambridge:
MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1995) The minimalist program.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harris, R. (1995). The
linguistic wars. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind
and its challenge to western
thought. New York: Basic
Books.
Newmeyer, F. (1986). Linguistic theory in
America. San
Diego/London:
Academic
Press.
About the
reviewer:
Chris Bongartz is Assistant
Professor of English at the University of North
Carolina, Charlotte. She received
her PhD in English Language and
Linguistics from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison. Her research
interests
include generative grammar and problems of second language acquisition, especially those
related to the syntax-morphology interface.
Her book on noun combination
typology in interlanguage will appear in the
fall with Niemeyer,
Tuebingen.
__________________________________________________________